|
English | Deutsch | Español | |
      |
   |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flow Analysis
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Challenge |
||
• |
High volume production with abrasive material (1 million parts per year) |
|
• |
Eliminate cold sprue in part center to avoid post molding operation |
|
• |
Fan part, requires tight roundness tolerance, rotates at high rpm in assembly |
|
Objective |
||
• |
Use flow analysis to determine best fill method |
|
• |
Improve part design for better flow properties |
|
• |
Design hot runner and mold layout to allow parts to be molded in a 250 ton machine |
|
Results |
||
• |
Cost savings, cold runner and secondary operations completely eliminated |
|
• |
Faster cycle times than center sprue gated |
|
• |
Perfect part dimensions achived through exact positioning of 3 nozzles |
|
• |
Improved cooling in part center |
|
• |
Return on investment for flow analysis, 1 week of production |
|
• |
Wear resistant Rheo-Pro® nozzle tips provide long gate life |
|
Related Items |
|||
|
Design Support |
||
|
|
|
Home / Technology / Flow Analysis / Case Study |
    |
